The Statute 1520a to the right in its entirety allows
through direct and indirect statutes allowing experiments that can
even be to terminate an individual or population, One of the casual
relationships we call to question is that of chemtrails ( massive widespread
spraying of the entire N. American continent with aluminum, barium
and specially treated desiccated blood platelets, and currently about
to released in pictures on stamps search chemtrails on the
internet ) and that of what we feel is a related widespread use
of 500 mile diameter radar pulses tailored to be as intense 500 miles
from the epicenter as it is at the epicenter using a special mathematical
process.
We feel that the excuse which may have truth to
it, where the DOD claims they are trying to reduce the greenhouse effect by
putting up a blanket of material to reflect light back into space, is only
a smokescreen for a secondary purpose which is the reduction of the source
of the problem of the green house effect problem namely mankind; and that
the real second use is to reduce mankind's numbers instead of releasing advanced
technology that can reduce emissions from mans activities, they won't release
the technology because it can also release third world nations from being
dominated by the oil industry and power brokering that the industry represents.
The technical issue is that humans breathing in
the metals sprayed all over them have these metals further drawn into vital
portions of the human cell structures of say the mitochondria tubules
and by high output emf from 500 mile
diameter radar and other local emf possibly even the ordinary 60 cycle
house wiring fields; where subsequently the 500 mile diameter radar bursts
or in case where a subject is implanted with a GPS microchip or a person
is targeted by home radar surveillance or other homeland security electronic
surveillance technology, will then have the cellular deposits
of metals and other toxins react directly to the emf of the radar
or home borne 60 cycle or intelligence surveillance that have an
electronic output that will electrophoretically affect the metals
to migrate into the cells and then subsequently act like an antenna increasing
the amplitude of emf signal or energy thereby effecting the biology of
people to reach damaging levels. It appears that such a methodology
is at work where the spraying and radar bursts are a means to decrease
the immune system and subsequently kill old and young alike with uncommon
systemic reactions due to hereditary predisposition.
A Point of fact addressed to any attorney lacking
loophole insight. Have you seen the evidence linked to suitable
urls in the above paragraphs, and could such activities be carried
out in lieu of the evidence without the intrepetion of the statute
to the right having loopholes as described. If you can not see the
facts now I suggest you change vocation.
|
-CITE-
50 USC Sec. 1520a 01/22/02
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 50 - WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
CHAPTER 32 - CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
PROGRAM
-HEAD-
Sec. 1520a. Restrictions on use of human subjects
for testing of
chemical or biological agents
-STATUTE-
|
|
(a) Prohibited activities
The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly
or by
contract) -
(1) any test or experiment involving the use of
a chemical
agent or biological agent on a civilian population;
or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological
agent
on human subjects.
|
|
( Research Investigators Note highlighted area
to the right reference highlighted letter ( d ) where is referencing
to notice to congress, thereby the exception has to do with the
"act" of notifying congress; whereupon when congress is so notified
of the intent of the "The Secretary of Defense" to carry out DOD
activities and the congress is so then notified and where congress
in the thirty day period days of notice fails to respond with a response
to intervene then the DOD can without such or any response carry out
their activities. Why should they notify congress, because congress
is your direct representative where they act on all citizens behalf's
by virtue of their status of appointed representatives; for the "The
Secretary of Defense" to tell them is a technicality that they have told
all citizens as the congress has the power to act on the citizens behalf
literally, literally in that congress can issue legislation to recruit,
nominate, volunteer you or otherwise directly action ate any activity
and further wherein they do or would not respond to such a DOD oriented
request is in actuality to allow through abrogation of authority the
activities presented by DOD authorities.
( Research Investigators Note highlighted area to
the right means that they have permission to do research and industrial
trials using electromagnetic weapons, viruses, biological, chemical,
and acoustic weapons to determine their efficiency at killing or
maiming using ordinary citizens like you and me .)
|
(b) Exceptions
Subject to subsections (c), (d) , and (e)
of this section, the
prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does
not apply to a
test or experiment carried out for any of the following
purposes:
(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical,
therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial,
or
research activity.
|
( Research Investigators ) Note in relation
to riot control, infers that the police will go up to protesters
to ask if some new control device can be used on them? I will assert
that is impossible and infers that the police act as representatives
for the crowd and determine what course of action is best done on
the behalf of the protesters, namely gas, shoot, mace, arrest, rubber
bullet, electronic denial or vomit inducing weapon, or blind them
or do the things mentioned on this site; meaning that just like a
congress that represents the people and churn out legislation, the
police will make the decisions because there is no way they could ask
the protesters. Its a given that they need to make decisions without
consent under extreme circumstances ( extreme is way wide open as a
reason to extend permissions,
a loophole lovers dream
come true. )
( Research Investigators ) Note :
The highlighted statement
above when taken in context with the assertion that it is in relation
to exemptions means actually NO informed consent is required when
coupled with exemption b-1 above making the consent requirement
below irrelevant, contrary to the way it is perceived alone as a statement;
in actuality a slickly written loophole phrase to state informed consent
is exempted from being required.
Additionally note above
number (3) Any law enforcement
purpose, including any purpose related
to riot control. Where together with consideration
that doctors have remained silent about fatal human experiments
proven to have been done and the always present corruption in government
it can be understood that since electronic weapons have been added
to Federal, State, and local elite police arsenals, and where such
devices are available it is inevitable that they are used in ways that
cause the harm written about on this web site and in the book.
End of Research Investigators Notation )
|
2) Any purpose that is directly related to
protection against
toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any
purpose related
to riot control.
(c) Informed consent required
The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment
described in subsection (b) of this section only
if informed
consent to the testing was obtained from each human
subject in
advance of the testing on that subject.
|
|
( Research Investigators ) Note in relation
to notification of congress is just as the issue of riot control,
where congress are true representatives they make law and without
the consent of the people but with tacit oermissionby being the peoples
representative, and that very issue illustrates that congress persons
are the ones technically giving written consent on behalf of the
citizens, the public need not be contacted as the representative acts
for them. Everything is done without notifying the public as usual
because in the case of congress needing to be notified is as it needed
to be to stop public notification, God knows we wouldn't give permission
without knowing everything. DOD personnel notifying the Congress is
technically to notify the public without actually doing so. In reality
the DOD can and does anything it wants through these loopholes and its
only obligation is to tell congress. All the other smoke and mirrors
statements have built in loopholes. )
Restated from above, needs to placed in this section
as follows:
( Research Investigators Note highlighted area to
the right reference highlighted letter ( d ) where is referencing to
notice to congress, thereby the exception has to do with the "act" of
notifying congress; whereupon when congress is so notified of the intent
of the "The Secretary of Defense" to carry out DOD activities and the
congress is so then notified and where congress in the thirty day period
days of notice fails to respond with a response or legislative conferencing
with Senators to bring a bill foward to counter the request to intervene,
then the DOD can without such or any response carry out their activities
unimpeded. Why should they notify congress, because congress is your direct
representative where they act on all citizens behalf's by virtue of their
status of appointed representatives; for the "The Secretary of Defense" to
tell them is a technicality that they have told all citizens as the congress
has the power to act on the citizens behalf literally, literally in
that congress can issue legislation to recruit, nominate, volunteer you
or otherwise directly action ate any activity and further wherein they
do or would not respond to such a DOD oriented request is in actuality
to allow through abrogation of authority the activities presented by DOD
authorities.
|
(d) Prior notice to Congress
Not later than 30 days after the date of final approval
within
the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment
or study to
be conducted by the Department of Defense (whether
directly or
under contract) involving the use of human subjects
for the testing
of a chemical agent or a biological agent, the Secretary
of Defense
shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services
of the Senate and
the Committee on Armed Services of the House of
Representatives a
report setting forth a full accounting of those
plans, and the
experiment or study may then be conducted only after
the end of the
30-day period beginning on the date such report
is received by
those committees.
|
|
(e) ''Biological agent'' defined
In this section, the term ''biological agent'' means
any
micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi,
rickettsiac, or
protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and
any naturally
occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component
of any such
micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance,
whatever its
origin or method of production, that is capable
of causing -
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction
in a human,
an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies,
or
materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.
|
|
-SOURCE-
(Pub. L. 105-85, div. A, title X, Sec. 1078, Nov.
18, 1997, 111
Stat. 1915; Pub. L. 106-65, div. A, title X, Sec.
1067(4), Oct. 5,
1999, 113 Stat. 774.)
-COD-
CODIFICATION
Section is comprised of section 1078 of Pub. L.
105-85. Subsec.
(f) of section 1078 of Pub. L. 105-85 amended section
1523(b) of
this title. Subsec. (g) of section 1078 of Pub.
L. 105-85 repealed
section 1520 of this title.
Section was enacted as part of the National Defense
Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1998, and not as part of Pub.
L. 91-121, title
IV, Sec. 409, Nov. 19, 1969, 83 Stat. 209, which
comprises this
chapter.
-MISC3-
AMENDMENTS
1999 - Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 106-65 substituted ''and
the
Committee on Armed Services'' for ''and the Committee
on National
Security''.
|
|
the above document can be seen on this following
government database url:
CLICK
HERE ( X )
|
